Skip to main content

Go Big and Reap the rewards of a residual compensation model

While studying various compensation approaches that line up with the way we want to grow our business, one approach that largely stood out and was well aligned for both us and the partner was the residual compensation approach. Simply put, a residual compensation approach is one where instead of paying all the compensation upfront for getting a widget (a line activation), we would end up splitting the compensation into a small upfront compensation plus a percent of compensation in equal installments over the life of the activated line (or the life of the customer). Let's consider some examples. In the carrier (or Uncarrier, should I say) world, the revenue that comes every month with every single line activated is called Monthly Recurring Revenues (MRCs in short). MRCs are the prices of rate plans and features added but do not include overages, fees etc. Typically compensation is paid as a multiplier of MRC. Let's assume for simplicity sake, the carrier's policy is to pay 4X MRC upfront but now is looking to move to an un-carrier compensation of 1X MRC upfront plus 15% of MRC residual in equal installments every month. A typical MRC is around $50. In the upfront model, the carrier would have paid $200. But in the residual model, the carrier would pay $50 upfront plus 15% of $50 = $7.50 in installments every month as long as the customer stays active. You might ask: what's the difference between the two, other than when they get paid? The difference is evident when seen through a business plan. Let's assume a partner brings 1000 activations every month and on an average a customer stays 24 months. See table below for detailed calculations. In this model, the carrier pays $3.5MM in the residual model as comp versus $4.8MM in the upfront model, a savings of 27% EBITDA, a crucial arrangement for publicly traded carriers. This also ties into the fact that lines have to stay 24 months to get paid the right amount. If all lines stayed 24 months, then the effective compensation per line would be 1X upfront + 24*15%*1X residual = 4.6X. Compare this to 4X upfront, a 15% gain. While the carrier saves EBITDA in the initial years, the partner gets backloaded with more comp than expected from an upfront model. And the relationship's goals are aligned.


Upfront Model Residual Model
Month Beginning customer Base Number of new customers Ending Customer Base Upfront 4X Comp Upfront 1X Comp Residual Comp Total Cash Flow
1 0 1000 1000 $200,000 $50,000 $7,500 $57,500
2 1000 1000 2000 $200,000 $50,000 $15,000 $65,000
3 2000 1000 3000 $200,000 $50,000 $22,500 $72,500
4 3000 1000 4000 $200,000 $50,000 $30,000 $80,000
5 4000 1000 5000 $200,000 $50,000 $37,500 $87,500
6 5000 1000 6000 $200,000 $50,000 $45,000 $95,000
7 6000 1000 7000 $200,000 $50,000 $52,500 $102,500
8 7000 1000 8000 $200,000 $50,000 $60,000 $110,000
9 8000 1000 9000 $200,000 $50,000 $67,500 $117,500
10 9000 1000 10000 $200,000 $50,000 $75,000 $125,000
11 10000 1000 11000 $200,000 $50,000 $82,500 $132,500
12 11000 1000 12000 $200,000 $50,000 $90,000 $140,000
13 12000 1000 13000 $200,000 $50,000 $97,500 $147,500
14 13000 1000 14000 $200,000 $50,000 $105,000 $155,000
15 14000 1000 15000 $200,000 $50,000 $112,500 $162,500
16 15000 1000 16000 $200,000 $50,000 $120,000 $170,000
17 16000 1000 17000 $200,000 $50,000 $127,500 $177,500
18 17000 1000 18000 $200,000 $50,000 $135,000 $185,000
19 18000 1000 19000 $200,000 $50,000 $142,500 $192,500
20 19000 1000 20000 $200,000 $50,000 $150,000 $200,000
21 20000 1000 21000 $200,000 $50,000 $157,500 $207,500
22 21000 1000 22000 $200,000 $50,000 $165,000 $215,000
23 22000 1000 23000 $200,000 $50,000 $172,500 $222,500
24 23000 1000 24000 $200,000 $50,000 $180,000 $230,000
Total 24000 $4,800,000 $1,200,000 $2,250,000 $3,450,000

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Using Issue Trees to investigate Product Cycle and Launch Challenges is an important arsenal in a product manager's armory

Most of the times, as a product manager, I solve complex problems under constraints within a short 2 to 3 weeks time, while not sacrificing creative thinking. The actual work shown here below demonstrates how I use a technique called Issue Tree Analysis (that I learnt from McKinsey Academy's problem Solving Leadership Program that I was nominated to attend by my company GE Digital) to investigate in a structured yet creative way. Structuring the issue as a SMART (Specific, Measurable, Actionable, Relevant, Timely) problem  and ensuring the identified issues were MECE (Mutually exclusive, completely exhaustive) were the most significant challenges I faced. On the positive side, such issue trees helped me capture a 360 degree view of the impacts solving the problem would have and help cover any unexpected failures due to major risk items not being identified for mitigation.

Are Product Managers ready for challenges in this exploding technology world? Rate yourself with the work stream chart below.

Product management is an intricate function and is really a confluence of Technology, Users and the Business. Some Product Managers (PM) love to use the venn diagram where they show that PM is the intersection of Users, Technology and Business and leave it at that. But I am a keen- eyed product manager, more organized and methodical and find that the PM work streams need to be spelt out a a lot more deeply. As a PM, I really love this detailed work stream interactions (not my chart; if you need source, ping me) based triangular confluence below. It demonstrates why Product Managers have to keep an eye on so many stakeholder interactions and not just be writing out engineering specs and participating in stand-up meetings. It take a lot folks to get a good product out and then measure the success KPIs of the product post release. Maintain or kill decision post release is one of the hardest things to do especially when you have sunk in millions of dollars into your product manag...

HealthCare Apps on Android Mobile Platforms command Second Best Pricing

Above chart indicates that not only are healthcare apps ranked second in price paid per app but the percent of paid apps (of all apps published) is the highest in the top 10 price per app cohort. It appears android users are voting with their feet on the value of mobile healthcare apps and app makers are increasingly able to move away from free apps. Healthcare software vendors may want to carefully look at mobile apps publishing as an additional way to monetize their value based care software revenue streams.  Source: Data is from AppBrain, a company that compiles Android Appstore analytics. The data is as of November 30, 2016.