Skip to main content

A company should focus on increasing price of its products (All else being constant or not deteriorating) to generate maximum profitability!

The title of this post may not be readily intuitive at first. Marketing and sales managers might think if I reduce my production or variable costs the profits might go up a lot more than increasing price; or they might think if I can cut down on my company fixed costs (overhead costs that do not vary with the quantity of items sold), then my profitability might go up even higher. So, before you go and layoff a bunch of overhead folks such as accountants and sales operations or convert an office mortgage into a lower opex lease to save on fixed costs, you may want to read this post.
Profitability is basically in its simplest form can be defined as:
Profits = (Price-Var. Cost)*Qty Sold - Fixed Costs. I am going to assign symbols to these words so we can make things a bit easier to depict.

In symbols:
Pr = (P - VC)*Q - FC ................................Eq. A

Now let's assume a company's current profitability situation:

Microsoft sells a version of Surface Pro 3 tablets for $800, the price P per unit. Let us also assume the variable cost per unit (VC) incurred to manufacture a Surface Pro 3 at $560. In Q4, let's assume Microsoft sold 10000 Surface Pro 3 tablets. Also, let's assume that the fixed costs incurred per quarter is $2M associated with Surface Pro 3 business department. Let's now calculate the current profitability:

Per Eq. A
Pr (Current) = ($800 -  $560)*10,000 - $2,000,000 = $400,000

Also, Profit Margin (Current) = Profitability divided by Revenues expressed as a percentage = $400,000/($800*10,000) = $400K/$8M = 5%

Now, we are going to alter each of the variables (P, VC, Q, FC) by 1% (one variable at a time, keeping all other variables constant) to witness the effect on profitability. Can you guess which variable would increase the profitability the most? The results are summarized in the table below:

Table 1: Change in profitability when each variable is changed by 1%



If you had guessed Price as the variable that is most sensitive toward profitability, you get an A+. As we can see in Table 1, a 1% increase in price leads to a 20% increase in profit, whereas a 1% increase in quantity or a 1% drop in fixed costs get you only a 6% or 5% increase in profitability, respectively. Even a 1% drop in variable costs cannot match a 1% increase in price's effect on profitability.

Therefore the implications are clear: if every other variable in the profitability equation can be kept constant or at the lease not allowed to deteriorate, a company that can command a better price for its product in the market place wins the profitability medal. 
Increasing price, however, may not be as easy as you think it is. Price elasticity of demand and the reference price of competing and substitute products force boundary conditions on how much a price can change. But that's another topic and for another post.The intent of this post was to demonstrate why all else being equal, a company should focus on getting a better price for its products. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Using Issue Trees to investigate Product Cycle and Launch Challenges is an important arsenal in a product manager's armory

Most of the times, as a product manager, I solve complex problems under constraints within a short 2 to 3 weeks time, while not sacrificing creative thinking. The actual work shown here below demonstrates how I use a technique called Issue Tree Analysis (that I learnt from McKinsey Academy's problem Solving Leadership Program that I was nominated to attend by my company GE Digital) to investigate in a structured yet creative way. Structuring the issue as a SMART (Specific, Measurable, Actionable, Relevant, Timely) problem  and ensuring the identified issues were MECE (Mutually exclusive, completely exhaustive) were the most significant challenges I faced. On the positive side, such issue trees helped me capture a 360 degree view of the impacts solving the problem would have and help cover any unexpected failures due to major risk items not being identified for mitigation.

Are Product Managers ready for challenges in this exploding technology world? Rate yourself with the work stream chart below.

Product management is an intricate function and is really a confluence of Technology, Users and the Business. Some Product Managers (PM) love to use the venn diagram where they show that PM is the intersection of Users, Technology and Business and leave it at that. But I am a keen- eyed product manager, more organized and methodical and find that the PM work streams need to be spelt out a a lot more deeply. As a PM, I really love this detailed work stream interactions (not my chart; if you need source, ping me) based triangular confluence below. It demonstrates why Product Managers have to keep an eye on so many stakeholder interactions and not just be writing out engineering specs and participating in stand-up meetings. It take a lot folks to get a good product out and then measure the success KPIs of the product post release. Maintain or kill decision post release is one of the hardest things to do especially when you have sunk in millions of dollars into your product manag...

HealthCare Apps on Android Mobile Platforms command Second Best Pricing

Above chart indicates that not only are healthcare apps ranked second in price paid per app but the percent of paid apps (of all apps published) is the highest in the top 10 price per app cohort. It appears android users are voting with their feet on the value of mobile healthcare apps and app makers are increasingly able to move away from free apps. Healthcare software vendors may want to carefully look at mobile apps publishing as an additional way to monetize their value based care software revenue streams.  Source: Data is from AppBrain, a company that compiles Android Appstore analytics. The data is as of November 30, 2016.